Christina Henricks has a flotilla of ardent admirers of her breasts, but alas, they are not real. The doctor did a good job on them though. The giveaway is the profile of her breasts when pushed together. (Profile is the amount of projection from the chest.)
Christina Hendricks High Profile Implants
Christina Hendricks High Profile Implants
Christina Hendricks High Profile Implants
Large natural breasts do not have that sort of profile when pushed together. The model below is an all natural 32DDD. See the difference?
Linsey
October 15th, 2009 - 4:33 am
Is there a picture of natural breasts pushed up like christina hendricks? The girl with natural breasts isn’t pushed up so can’t judge from that.
October 15th, 2009 - 1:39 pm
Why is this on goodplasticsurgery? It looks awful :S.
October 15th, 2009 - 4:03 pm
Her boobs look totally unreal, I’d not call this “good” plastic surgery. Pornstar boobs anyone?
October 16th, 2009 - 2:19 am
I’m gonna play devil’s advocate and say they’re real. Her figure would support those sized breasts and they don’t have that implant-y Barbie-esque look to them. They look like boobs that would sag if not for the push-up bra’s she constantly wears. I’m gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you. And the first poster is right- it’s not a fair comparison since it’s her in push up’s and dresses versus a girl in a loose bikini.
October 16th, 2009 - 11:40 am
My breasts look like hers and mine are real…
October 16th, 2009 - 1:47 pm
I agree with Kat and Jeeves. There is no real comparison because Christina’s breast well supported and pushed up where the model’s is not.
October 16th, 2009 - 1:51 pm
This should posted in awfulplasticsurgery.com not good one. It’s simply too large for a slim woman! The third picture is extremely weird.
October 18th, 2009 - 5:35 am
Why the hell would you classify this as good plastic surgery, it isn’t bad enough for awful plastic surgery, but they look gross. I jae seen average chicks that I personally know that have had great surgery and they don’t have the money to go to the same surgeons as famous people do and have far better jobs done on them.
October 19th, 2009 - 4:00 pm
What is good about these breast implants?? Are oversized, square, poorly placed implants now the look to have? They are practically hitting her in the face.
Were I she, I’d have a lawsuit in place against her doctor. You need to reconsider your opinion and put her in the “bad” category. Yuck!
October 20th, 2009 - 8:23 am
Those are her real breasts. She’s 100% natural!! Beautiful, beautiful girl.
Though she squeezes into tops that are too small but I suspect that has more to do with the fact that actresses are expected to fit into those unreal sample size clothes designers lend out.
October 20th, 2009 - 1:05 pm
They sure look real to me! I have very real 36DD’s, and have for over 20 years now.
Her breasts look very much like mine do. Especially when, as you might imagine, we have a heck of a time finding great outfits that can also accommodate the excess boobage. They do have to head too far north in some tops, to be sure, and can look odd. When I was pregnant, my boobs really looked like her examples! She would definitely benefit from better fitting garments; those that give our great breasts a “shelf effect” – slims the rib cage area and makes our skin look and feel creamy soft on top. If I am ever asked if they are not real, I just laugh; let them wonder!
I just think Christina has great decollette. She pulls it off as so few can!
The model on the bottom looks far from real; the breasts are unnaturally closely cropped.
October 21st, 2009 - 10:27 am
I think you chose a poor comparison picture. My natural 32FF breasts look really different in a tight dress versus a triangle bikini top. To me, Hendricks’ breasts look totally natural- mine do exactly the same thing when squeezed into a strapless dress.
October 21st, 2009 - 1:17 pm
True, but the model in the second picture doesn’t have her breasts pushed up in a really tight dress or bra like Christina does either. I don’t know with this one, it’s pretty dubious. I mean, my boobs are 100% real and end up looking like the first picture in the right outfit too, or the second girl in a wireless bikini….
October 21st, 2009 - 1:31 pm
Those boobs are hideous – they should be on awfulplasticsurgery.com !!
October 22nd, 2009 - 4:08 pm
Uhm, Christina’s may be fake, though it’s difficult to determine in the pics, but the second model’s are most definitely fake. They look more natural, but are still clearly fake.
If you’re going to run a website proclaiming you know something about plastic surgery you should at least know what boobs look like- real and fake!
October 22nd, 2009 - 7:42 pm
Nope. I’m with the other commenters — I’ve got natural big ones myself, and I say these are real. Hendricks is binding them very tightly at the bottom, that’s what’s giving the ‘projection’. You can get the top half of the breast fat to balloon out from the skin and the sternum by cinching the bottom half. (If they’re big enough, that is. And if they are made of real breast, not silicone.) Your comparison model hasn’t bound hers at all.
Fakes wouldn’t look luscious when cinched, they would just look bulgy and bisected. Come on, you’ve covered bad fakes that look like that!
I love that C. Hendricks doesn’t cover these up, or get a reduction. They’re gorgeous.
October 23rd, 2009 - 5:05 am
they’re real – if they were like for like pushups, we could reach a conclusion.
October 24th, 2009 - 7:23 am
How is the girl in the second picture breasts real? She clearly has a uniboob due to bad plastic surgery. Anyone can see that.
October 24th, 2009 - 10:55 am
This is a false comparison – you can’t use a model with naturally large breasts in a string bikini and then say “look! they’re not shaped the same!” String bikinis have zero support. You also don’t show Christina Hendricks in a dress that doesn’t push her breasts up for a valid comparison to the model.
I’m a naturally 34DDDD and in the right bra, my breasts look totally fake.
October 25th, 2009 - 2:22 pm
Those are not good plastic surgery at all. They are way too big for her frame, and overfilled (and kinda square). Yes in the right dress real breasts look almost fake, but boobs with too much projection on the top are always fake.
October 26th, 2009 - 12:31 pm
They look absurdly artificial. Real boobs do not have a distinct edge, even when pushed halfway up your neck like this. When they look like enormous coconut halves stuffed under your skin, they’re fake.
October 26th, 2009 - 12:57 pm
Another awful result labeled as _Good Plastic Surgery_. From the perspective of a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon, here are the flaws with this lady’s “job”:
* The right implant is higher than the left. Asymmetry!
* Were the implants placed on top of the muscle? On a thin patient, I would recommend that the implants be inserted beneath the muscle.
* The implants are far too big for her frame.
Overall, she looks ridiculous. If she is interested in a natural result, she should find a doctor who is Certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery.
October 27th, 2009 - 3:07 am
Good implants???
They look like kids parties ballons!!! UGLY UGLY UGLY!!!!!!!
October 27th, 2009 - 10:24 am
Disagree with anyone who says these are real, or that they look real. As a woman with a natural large bust (larger than this), I can say this is NOT who breasts do. Breasts this large aren’t perfectly “held” narrowly and pushed up in this manner. They would bulge out and overlap her outfits slightly. Also, they wouldn’t be so perfectly “oval” at the top but would rather meld with the flesh of her upper chest to look more naturally round.
These are just very bad fakes and they shouldn’t be on here at all. If anything, I would say Amy Winehouse’s new balloons are more “natural” looking than this.
October 27th, 2009 - 11:28 am
That’s hardly a fair comparison! The bikinigirls book aren’t all squished up in tight dresses like Hendricks, hence haven’t got the same roundness on top.
October 27th, 2009 - 4:08 pm
Since there’s so much speculation about whether they’re real or not, I’d say this article belongs to goodplasticsurgery! I totally understand those commented earlier than me, claiming that they’re real, because those round lines do appear when pushed together. However, I think they should look at the mirror (which I did) and notice that the line doesn’t appear near the shoulders, like Christina Hendrickx’.
October 27th, 2009 - 10:36 pm
I am terribly sorry, but this womans breats are horrible. Has there been some confusion? perhaps she best belongs on Awful Plastic Surgery? further the 2nd model you use to illustrate natural breasts is not natural….look at the cleavege, its joined together not allowing any natural swing of each breast, I dare say this woman is also artifically enhanced and badly so.
October 27th, 2009 - 10:37 pm
Drunk editor perhaps? blind maybe? both these girls have terrible artificial boobs! Yuck
October 28th, 2009 - 3:32 am
Those look really bad.
October 28th, 2009 - 10:30 am
The bottom model has fake breasts too. They are artificially close together in a top with no side support to push them together. While this would tend to make them look more ‘natural’ in a bra, it males them obviously fake in a bikini top. Any closer together and it woudl be symmastia.
October 28th, 2009 - 10:31 am
The bottom model has fake breasts too. They are artificially close together in a top with no side support to push them together. While this would tend to make them look more ‘natural’ in a bra, it males them obviously fake in a bikini top. Any closer together and it would be symmastia.
October 29th, 2009 - 3:17 pm
The line of demarcation is too obviously pronounced, and one is higher than the higher. Absolutely fake.
November 3rd, 2009 - 10:08 am
I think Christina looks great, but I still think her boobs are fake. The pronounced curve at the top when she pushes them up is too perfect to be natural. (especially near the armpit) I have a friend with comprable breasts, and she often wears them pushed up, and they never look that perfectly rounded.
Also in other pictures I have seen (not on this site) at a side view, you can kind of see where the implant starts.
I do think its likely, tho, that her natural boobs were probably fairly large and provide plenty of padding to keep her from getting the “bolt on” look, since she does have a pretty curvy figure.
November 23rd, 2009 - 12:21 am
Just my two cents: I have natural 36 DDD’s and when I wear a push-up bra, my chest looks exactly the same as Christinas in the pictures shown. Not saying that hers are definitely real, but the pictures are not justification to assume they aren’t.
November 25th, 2009 - 9:49 pm
Christina Hendricks has REAL boobs people, she’s talked about them before in interviews…
“I didn’t get a boob job. It’s who I am. And I’m lucky to be on a show that celebrates it.” – talking about her show Man Men
November 26th, 2009 - 2:24 pm
I think they are real. You can’t really compare a french bikini shot to a taped and pushed up celebrity evening gown shot. I don’t think “real” boobs look like that in a bikini top, but when the stars are taped and pushed up and bound up inside an evening dress, that look is totally possible with real breasts.
November 26th, 2009 - 3:00 pm
Both of them have bad uniboob! Theirs are not real at all! What kind of push up bra are you wearing you’re talking about?
November 26th, 2009 - 7:42 pm
It’s debateable whether or not Christina’s are real. I have natural 42EE and mine can look like that at times.
For the people saying the second model’s are fake, you’re dead wrong….well, depending how you look at it, I guess. But she certainly doesn’t have implants. She’s an English model by the name of Linsey Dawn McKenzie. She famously had a reduction from some thing like an H down to around a DD. She was bikini modeling when she was 15 and topless when she was 16 and already, I think, a G. So sorry, no implants, but slight tampering.
November 30th, 2009 - 10:13 am
Who’s the model?
December 10th, 2009 - 5:35 pm
To the people who are claiming fake based on one being higher than the other–my boobs are not the same size. I don’t know many women who have perfectly symmetrical breasts (unless they’ve had them done) and yes, one of mine appears to sit higher than the other when I wear clothing that is really too small to accomodate them
December 12th, 2009 - 12:04 pm
Speculation is a foolish pursuit.
Here is a verbatim quote from the woman herself, and an end to all this speculationary nonsense!
“I didn’t get a boob job. It’s who I am. And I’m lucky to be on a show that celebrates it.”
- Christina Hendricks
December 14th, 2009 - 5:48 am
I expected to see Christina on badplasticsurgery; not here. Even before my reduction surgery 10 years ago, my 44FF boobs never looked SQUARE when cinched or corseted! She’s a lovely woman, great actress, but her boob job wasn’t very good, imo.
also, your comparison model is breadloafing – how sure are you that she’s a natural?
December 22nd, 2009 - 1:04 pm
I have to disagree with this assessment. You can’t tell from these photos. If you push up large natural breasts, and pad the bottom, it can give the same high profile effect, especially with corsets. I can achieve that effect quite easily myself. You can only tell when people move, if you have a video, real ones should jiggle slightly in a fleshy sort of way, whereas plastic ones stay rigid.
I’m not saying hers are real, just that you can’t tell from these pictures. If you can find before and after, that would be convincing!
Also, I agree that the model has breadloafing, and does not look natural at all. She’s probably got plastic teardrop shaped implants into already quite large boobs.
January 20th, 2010 - 5:40 pm
Are her boob loopsided???? or is it just me.
February 9th, 2010 - 10:27 am
GratuitousViolets is one of the few sane voices on here.
There is no such size as a DDDD. The commentator claiming to have them is probably an A cup lying for effect, like I imagine several of these “large busted women” commenting.
A 42 band size cannot compare themselves to Hendricks. The band size is the inch measurement around your rib cage under your breasts. If you’re wearing a 42, you either don’t know how to size anything (and thus your opinion doesn’t hold much merit) or you’re quite overweight, and cannot be compared to someone this slim.
The model could very easily have real breasts. An utter lack of space between naturally large breasts is very possible–it’s the reason my mother has never been able to wear underwire bras. Regardless, even if the model simply has a good boob job (and it WOULD be good, as there is no profile or line) they still look far more real than Hendricks’s. No amount of pushing up can create that crease at the top. The only reason some unobservant people are fooled is because she was naturally very busty beforehand–she had a lot more mammary tissue to place the implants in, making them look more real. Ever notice how a woman with A’s gone to D’s look horrible, whereas a woman with C’s gone to D’s looks far better? It’s why they always say women with very little body fat shouldn’t get large implants. Hendricks had the breast tissue to make it work; frankly, I find it sad that rather than embrace her NATURALLY curvy form, she had to make herself look like a porn star. She could have been beautiful, but surgery made her look ridiculous. Pretending she didn’t have it, and that she’s a champion for women accepting their shape…well, that just makes her pathetic, and insults REAL women.