Christina Henricks has a flotilla of ardent admirers of her breasts, but alas, they are not real. The doctor did a good job on them though. The giveaway is the profile of her breasts when pushed together. (Profile is the amount of projection from the chest.)
Christina Hendricks High Profile Implants
Christina Hendricks High Profile Implants
Christina Hendricks High Profile Implants
Large natural breasts do not have that sort of profile when pushed together. The model below is an all natural 32DDD. See the difference?
Linsey
October 15th, 2009 - 4:33 am
Is there a picture of natural breasts pushed up like christina hendricks? The girl with natural breasts isn’t pushed up so can’t judge from that.
October 15th, 2009 - 1:39 pm
Why is this on goodplasticsurgery? It looks awful :S.
October 15th, 2009 - 4:03 pm
Her boobs look totally unreal, I’d not call this “good” plastic surgery. Pornstar boobs anyone?
October 16th, 2009 - 2:19 am
I’m gonna play devil’s advocate and say they’re real. Her figure would support those sized breasts and they don’t have that implant-y Barbie-esque look to them. They look like boobs that would sag if not for the push-up bra’s she constantly wears. I’m gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you. And the first poster is right- it’s not a fair comparison since it’s her in push up’s and dresses versus a girl in a loose bikini.
October 16th, 2009 - 11:40 am
My breasts look like hers and mine are real…
October 16th, 2009 - 1:47 pm
I agree with Kat and Jeeves. There is no real comparison because Christina’s breast well supported and pushed up where the model’s is not.
October 16th, 2009 - 1:51 pm
This should posted in awfulplasticsurgery.com not good one. It’s simply too large for a slim woman! The third picture is extremely weird.
October 18th, 2009 - 5:35 am
Why the hell would you classify this as good plastic surgery, it isn’t bad enough for awful plastic surgery, but they look gross. I jae seen average chicks that I personally know that have had great surgery and they don’t have the money to go to the same surgeons as famous people do and have far better jobs done on them.
October 19th, 2009 - 4:00 pm
What is good about these breast implants?? Are oversized, square, poorly placed implants now the look to have? They are practically hitting her in the face.
Were I she, I’d have a lawsuit in place against her doctor. You need to reconsider your opinion and put her in the “bad” category. Yuck!
October 20th, 2009 - 8:23 am
Those are her real breasts. She’s 100% natural!! Beautiful, beautiful girl.
Though she squeezes into tops that are too small but I suspect that has more to do with the fact that actresses are expected to fit into those unreal sample size clothes designers lend out.
October 20th, 2009 - 1:05 pm
They sure look real to me! I have very real 36DD’s, and have for over 20 years now.
Her breasts look very much like mine do. Especially when, as you might imagine, we have a heck of a time finding great outfits that can also accommodate the excess boobage. They do have to head too far north in some tops, to be sure, and can look odd. When I was pregnant, my boobs really looked like her examples! She would definitely benefit from better fitting garments; those that give our great breasts a “shelf effect” – slims the rib cage area and makes our skin look and feel creamy soft on top. If I am ever asked if they are not real, I just laugh; let them wonder!
I just think Christina has great decollette. She pulls it off as so few can!
The model on the bottom looks far from real; the breasts are unnaturally closely cropped.
October 21st, 2009 - 10:27 am
I think you chose a poor comparison picture. My natural 32FF breasts look really different in a tight dress versus a triangle bikini top. To me, Hendricks’ breasts look totally natural- mine do exactly the same thing when squeezed into a strapless dress.
October 21st, 2009 - 1:17 pm
True, but the model in the second picture doesn’t have her breasts pushed up in a really tight dress or bra like Christina does either. I don’t know with this one, it’s pretty dubious. I mean, my boobs are 100% real and end up looking like the first picture in the right outfit too, or the second girl in a wireless bikini….
October 21st, 2009 - 1:31 pm
Those boobs are hideous – they should be on awfulplasticsurgery.com !!
October 22nd, 2009 - 4:08 pm
Uhm, Christina’s may be fake, though it’s difficult to determine in the pics, but the second model’s are most definitely fake. They look more natural, but are still clearly fake.
If you’re going to run a website proclaiming you know something about plastic surgery you should at least know what boobs look like- real and fake!
October 22nd, 2009 - 7:42 pm
Nope. I’m with the other commenters — I’ve got natural big ones myself, and I say these are real. Hendricks is binding them very tightly at the bottom, that’s what’s giving the ‘projection’. You can get the top half of the breast fat to balloon out from the skin and the sternum by cinching the bottom half. (If they’re big enough, that is. And if they are made of real breast, not silicone.) Your comparison model hasn’t bound hers at all.
Fakes wouldn’t look luscious when cinched, they would just look bulgy and bisected. Come on, you’ve covered bad fakes that look like that!
I love that C. Hendricks doesn’t cover these up, or get a reduction. They’re gorgeous.
October 23rd, 2009 - 5:05 am
they’re real – if they were like for like pushups, we could reach a conclusion.
October 24th, 2009 - 7:23 am
How is the girl in the second picture breasts real? She clearly has a uniboob due to bad plastic surgery. Anyone can see that.
October 24th, 2009 - 10:55 am
This is a false comparison – you can’t use a model with naturally large breasts in a string bikini and then say “look! they’re not shaped the same!” String bikinis have zero support. You also don’t show Christina Hendricks in a dress that doesn’t push her breasts up for a valid comparison to the model.
I’m a naturally 34DDDD and in the right bra, my breasts look totally fake.
October 25th, 2009 - 2:22 pm
Those are not good plastic surgery at all. They are way too big for her frame, and overfilled (and kinda square). Yes in the right dress real breasts look almost fake, but boobs with too much projection on the top are always fake.
October 26th, 2009 - 12:31 pm
They look absurdly artificial. Real boobs do not have a distinct edge, even when pushed halfway up your neck like this. When they look like enormous coconut halves stuffed under your skin, they’re fake.
October 26th, 2009 - 12:57 pm
Another awful result labeled as _Good Plastic Surgery_. From the perspective of a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon, here are the flaws with this lady’s “job”:
* The right implant is higher than the left. Asymmetry!
* Were the implants placed on top of the muscle? On a thin patient, I would recommend that the implants be inserted beneath the muscle.
* The implants are far too big for her frame.
Overall, she looks ridiculous. If she is interested in a natural result, she should find a doctor who is Certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery.
October 27th, 2009 - 3:07 am
Good implants???
They look like kids parties ballons!!! UGLY UGLY UGLY!!!!!!!
October 27th, 2009 - 10:24 am
Disagree with anyone who says these are real, or that they look real. As a woman with a natural large bust (larger than this), I can say this is NOT who breasts do. Breasts this large aren’t perfectly “held” narrowly and pushed up in this manner. They would bulge out and overlap her outfits slightly. Also, they wouldn’t be so perfectly “oval” at the top but would rather meld with the flesh of her upper chest to look more naturally round.
These are just very bad fakes and they shouldn’t be on here at all. If anything, I would say Amy Winehouse’s new balloons are more “natural” looking than this.
October 27th, 2009 - 11:28 am
That’s hardly a fair comparison! The bikinigirls book aren’t all squished up in tight dresses like Hendricks, hence haven’t got the same roundness on top.
October 27th, 2009 - 4:08 pm
Since there’s so much speculation about whether they’re real or not, I’d say this article belongs to goodplasticsurgery! I totally understand those commented earlier than me, claiming that they’re real, because those round lines do appear when pushed together. However, I think they should look at the mirror (which I did) and notice that the line doesn’t appear near the shoulders, like Christina Hendrickx’.
October 27th, 2009 - 10:36 pm
I am terribly sorry, but this womans breats are horrible. Has there been some confusion? perhaps she best belongs on Awful Plastic Surgery? further the 2nd model you use to illustrate natural breasts is not natural….look at the cleavege, its joined together not allowing any natural swing of each breast, I dare say this woman is also artifically enhanced and badly so.
October 27th, 2009 - 10:37 pm
Drunk editor perhaps? blind maybe? both these girls have terrible artificial boobs! Yuck
October 28th, 2009 - 3:32 am
Those look really bad.
October 28th, 2009 - 10:30 am
The bottom model has fake breasts too. They are artificially close together in a top with no side support to push them together. While this would tend to make them look more ‘natural’ in a bra, it males them obviously fake in a bikini top. Any closer together and it woudl be symmastia.
October 28th, 2009 - 10:31 am
The bottom model has fake breasts too. They are artificially close together in a top with no side support to push them together. While this would tend to make them look more ‘natural’ in a bra, it males them obviously fake in a bikini top. Any closer together and it would be symmastia.
October 29th, 2009 - 3:17 pm
The line of demarcation is too obviously pronounced, and one is higher than the higher. Absolutely fake.
November 3rd, 2009 - 10:08 am
I think Christina looks great, but I still think her boobs are fake. The pronounced curve at the top when she pushes them up is too perfect to be natural. (especially near the armpit) I have a friend with comprable breasts, and she often wears them pushed up, and they never look that perfectly rounded.
Also in other pictures I have seen (not on this site) at a side view, you can kind of see where the implant starts.
I do think its likely, tho, that her natural boobs were probably fairly large and provide plenty of padding to keep her from getting the “bolt on” look, since she does have a pretty curvy figure.