Do you think that Jennifer Aniston’s breasts grew or did GQ go nuts with the photoshop brush? In the 90s, her chest was petite and now it looks like she is possesor of these large, yet perky bosoms (if real and not the product of photoshop, I suspect silicone).
Here’s the comparison.
December 18th, 2008 - 8:45 am
They look pretty similar to me, and certainly don’t have an “implant” look to them. I think you’re stretching.
December 18th, 2008 - 11:39 am
I honestly don’t think they are bigger. Probably photoshop.
December 18th, 2008 - 12:51 pm
I don’t see any difference.
December 18th, 2008 - 4:29 pm
no silicone..just the angle in which the photo was taken makes it appear larger than it actually is
December 18th, 2008 - 6:50 pm
It’s not uncommon for womens’ breast to grow after age 30. A lot of women who are flat-chested will develop later on.
December 19th, 2008 - 6:24 am
I think this one’s a wild goose chase. Normally I am inclined to agree with you, but her breasts look normal. Especially if you look at the pics inside the magazine, you’ll see that they’re the same size as before and don’t look bolted on or anything like that. Those tits look all natural to me.
December 19th, 2008 - 6:40 am
Or it could be photoshopped.
December 19th, 2008 - 12:30 pm
Men and many plastic surgeons make me laugh, you know nothing about ‘boobs as fat storage!’ True, Hollywood Alisters like Sharon Stone, Nicole Kidman and Megan Fox, get much smaller implants which make them harder to tell from natural breasts or the larger implants that many women like Lindsay Lohan and X-Tina choose but many of you don’t realize how retouched and enhanced the majority of photos are.
December 19th, 2008 - 1:40 pm
Angi had 3 kids jen didnt. So shes not streached marked like Angi the man stealer. Jen probly did this to say eat your heart out Angi and but head Brad.
December 19th, 2008 - 8:00 pm
In the 2008 photo, it is possible that she is putting pressure on her right breast with her right hand (left side of photo), slightly pushing tissue upward. In the earlier photo, she may be covering her nipples only, without putting any pressure on the breast tissue.
December 20th, 2008 - 9:39 am
Her boobs are the same as before with maybe a little photoshop help. But what about that monstrous chin of hers? Her chin was not that big in her early days but its huge now. She looks quite manly with that chin.
December 20th, 2008 - 8:21 pm
they do look fuller around the top of her breasts. But that could be due to her pushing them up with her hands, or photoshop. What probably makes people think she has had an augmentation is that as she has gotten thinner, her breasts haven’t changed much.
December 21st, 2008 - 9:26 am
i think a lot of ithas to do with the angle of her arms – in the first one they are out and to the side. in the latest one her arms are down – this can change how the breasts lay
December 21st, 2008 - 9:30 am
no way! they aren’t any bigger than the first photo. actually, they look pretty big if you look on the right side of the first photo, down in the corner, where the shadow is, you can see the volume of the breast. in the second photo (and that whole set of photos in GQ) a lot of photoshop was used, and i also think she is pushing her boob on to her chest with her hand which spreads the volume out (it seems a lot of victoria’s secret models employ this technique when shooting in panties, with no bra). in both photos, i think they are just the right size; large but not so large that they lose their perky and look matronly.
December 22nd, 2008 - 5:09 pm
they are not fake
she is just pushing them together and also the skin color is touched up to take out veins etc
have you noticed no one has veins on their hands feet or chests in magazines
all thanks to photoshop
she has had some botox and her upper lip looks bigger then it used to
December 22nd, 2008 - 7:22 pm
seriously, you’ve never seen the difference in how your boobs look depending on if your arms are lifted or not?
also, as far as jessica biel goes–bra, then no bra. DUH.
You either don’t have boobs and have no idea how they ‘work’ or are just plain overzealous. calm down.
December 23rd, 2008 - 1:55 pm
Fantastic work!
December 26th, 2008 - 7:50 pm
they look exactly the same
December 31st, 2008 - 4:13 pm
I agree with one of the comments earlier… A smaller, more subtle augmentation and/or lift to make the breasts look “younger”. The best surgery is the more subtle kind. I also agree with another comment on her face… When I first saw these pictures, I had a hard time believing it was Jennifer Aniston! I think she looks great, but not “herself” (e.g. when Jennifer Grey got her nose job).
January 2nd, 2009 - 10:55 pm
I think she might of had a little implant put in. Look how far they go under her arms. I mean I know Jen is the sweetest person out there,but having implants doesn’t make her any less sweeter. So all you fans of Jen out there,admitting that you think she did have work done is fine. Hell,as honest and natural as she is,I bet she will admit it herself one day.
January 6th, 2009 - 1:38 pm
They also go far under her arms in the first pick.
January 20th, 2009 - 2:44 pm
i agree with patti. plus in other pics, when she i wearing a tight fitting dress and leans over, you can see the valley gap between her implants. and judging photoshop pics is outrageous. they could do anything with them. reall pics are where its at.
January 30th, 2009 - 2:25 pm
I just wanted to comment on her chin which is so square and huge. Why doesn’t anyone ever mention that? Does no one see her chin? Women’s chins are small (for the most part — there are indeed exceptions), and delicate. In perfect balance with the rest of their face. Look at the classic movie stars. They were really gorgeous and natural looking. Well, I just wanted to comment on her chin, not her breasts.
February 13th, 2009 - 9:44 pm
Or maybe since the “after” photo was most likely airbrushed to enhance her breasts for selling the magazine you’re all thinking she’s had implants? I’ve been reading this blog for a long time now. Two years almost. I notice that a lot….the after pictures tend to be photoshopped or air brushed. don’t be so quick to judge. just because someone is beautiful to you, doesn’t mean they don’t struggle with a lot of self esteem issues.
February 14th, 2009 - 5:07 pm
She looks better in the black and white picture. Now she just looks like a whore.
February 17th, 2009 - 11:39 am
She definitely had small silicone implants put in. There is no question about it. It is like Size Queen posted above. All of the thin Hollywood A listers have small implants put in so their breasts are just a little fuller, rounder and perkier. Just like they all have subtle finesse rhinoplasty done so they look more refined on camera. It is kind of like the athletes with steroid they cannot compete without it.
March 3rd, 2009 - 10:07 pm
Her breasts are far from petite in the first picture.
March 8th, 2009 - 10:01 am
Saw her on Oprah Winfrey and thought she looked bigger then. I think she has a fake rack.
March 11th, 2009 - 7:58 pm
Her breasts? Who cares. Why do guys like Aniston if she is still an airhead. Lisa Kudrow might be a blonde but she is much smarter than Aniston. I’d take Lisa even if she is smaller breasted.
June 13th, 2009 - 8:37 am
Look about the same to me. And I certainly would not consider them large by any means. She is so beautiful!!
September 3rd, 2009 - 8:25 pm
They are 100% real. Jen would never get plastic surgery.
October 24th, 2009 - 8:38 am
come on…it’s photo shop not implants
December 26th, 2009 - 2:32 pm
She’s still homely, and hardly the beauty her handlers try to make her out to be.
January 20th, 2010 - 9:57 am
no surgery. and she looked so great back there ): now she’s not that good looking anymore
February 6th, 2010 - 7:36 pm
they look fake in both photos