Comment by Dana — November 12, 2008 at 8:25 am

great smile. good dental work.

Comment by Cheri — November 12, 2008 at 1:12 pm

While she doesn’t appear to have had anything done, she also looks very wrinkled for 52. Most women in the Midwest at least don’t have that many wrinkles even in their 80s. A friend I know is in her late 50s and has no wrinkles or age spots at all on her face. Partly good genes, partly sun avoidance and party living in Montana where it isn’t so polluted. Pollution in the air and water is one of the biggest ager and LA is horrible for pollution which is probably why so many stars age so badly. Linda has a bad drug history too so I suspect that is part of the issue. My aunts in their 80s have a little bit of jaw sagging and a few eye wrinkles. Now you see women in their 20s who look older.

Comment by claire — November 13, 2008 at 10:36 pm

How refreshing!!!! I am so sick of these frozen faces and trout pouts!!!

Comment by paula_erre — November 14, 2008 at 4:17 am

good for her!
but I think that hollywod will never call her again.
It’s a shame

Comment by magdamill — November 14, 2008 at 1:31 pm

Peraps natural but it doesn’t mean better.Too much diet and working out. My mom’s 54 and looks younger without any plastic surgery (but she’s not that skinny)

Comment by Meimei — November 14, 2008 at 2:04 pm

She looks old for a 52-year old… More like sixty to me. Then again, I might be related to a lot of women with amazing genes (hey, that means I’ve got them too), because none of them looked like this when they were in their fifties.

And yes, I know for sure none of them had any “upgrading” done.

Good for her, going natural - too bad for her oversized skin…

Comment by Fer — November 14, 2008 at 4:21 pm

You can also name Jane Birkin, 61

Comment by Pickle6 — November 16, 2008 at 8:03 am

Linda looks way older than 52, she looks more like 72. She has way more wrinkles than I do, and I’m 59. Either she lied about her age or she’s ill.

Comment by stopthecutting — November 17, 2008 at 12:21 pm

In the spirit of both Ms Hepburns. Good for her!

Comment by saralin — November 24, 2008 at 3:25 am

Oh my god! She looks so, so…… normal! You go girl!

Comment by Anon — November 28, 2008 at 8:25 am

According to certain other sites I’ve visited, Linda has smoked since she was very young. It’s now that the effects are showing in her face.

Comment by brandysgirl — November 30, 2008 at 12:08 am

I’m the same age as her but she looks bad to me. It must be living in LA & being in the sun all the time with no sunscreen. If I were her I would get alittle bit done.

Comment by tammy — December 7, 2008 at 2:24 pm

she looks gross get some botox and fillers or something ewwww

Comment by ryan — December 11, 2008 at 4:21 am

she looks normal not like a plastic barbie doll like most of these celebrities that get work

Comment by trishala — December 11, 2008 at 4:21 am

she looks bloody good for her age

Comment by ez — December 20, 2008 at 3:38 pm

Keep in mind she’s making a grimace in this photo. I for one this she looks gorgeous, as always.

Comment by w3w — December 23, 2008 at 6:19 pm

It’s not like all people in Hollywood age badly and have all gotten plastic surgery, you know. My mom is almost 53 and she has NO wrinkles whatsoever. She looks like she’s in her early 30s. It comes with taking care of yourself, staying out of the sun, not smoking, not being an alcoholic, moisturizing, and of course… our amazing genetics. >:)

Comment by Patti — January 2, 2009 at 11:12 pm

AAAHHHH!!!! Now what are we to do?? A woman aging naturally and looking great doing it! What is this world coming to??

Comment by richa — January 4, 2009 at 6:34 pm

she seems to have aged more than she should have for a 52 yr old.she can easily pass off as a granny in her late 60s